Moving to ...

Moved to Pressing For Truth In seeking truth, one does not find it by these immature and primitive methods. See RULES FOR COMMENTS (Right Sidebar)

Search This Blog

FrontPage Magazine » FrontPage

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

MEET THE TWO AMERICA'S -- & -- Al Gore, a Gift that Keeps on Giving: His recipe - How to Cook Mammoth


                  WE ARE THE 99%!


"The president stated that "some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and that's not just."  Ladies and gentlemen, I submit for your honest consideration, Barack Obama in stating such beliefs is preaching the rationale of thievery.

The other guy has it, you want it, take it.

There are TWO AMERICAS...indeed there are!

The American people who work and those who don't.
The American people who contribute and those who don't.
It's not those who have and those who have not.
It's those who do and those who do not.

Don't confuse those who "can not" with those who "do not."

Some people meet their responsibility and do their duty as American citizens.
They obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't.

That is the divide, and therein lies the two Americas.



AGB writes:


Income inequality has suddenly transformed into inequality of opportunity. In other words, the terminology has changed in the same fashion that Global Warming had transformed into "climate change," homosexual sex into "marriage equality," meaning, no matter which way the climate changes they'll be right, and queers can beget children on the Planet Pluto but not on this one - even when "married." The president said that women make 70 cents for every dollar a man makes - an extension of THE WAR ON WOMEN. He must have meant the war on the tens of millions of women,
wives, sisters,
mothers and daughters who lost their jobs, homes and families
since the Democrats took over Congress in 2006 and Obama in 2008.
Eight years of the ongoing war.

If there were a WAR ON WOMEN, the Democrats waged it and won it.

America's women got to pay for it and it'll take generations to recover from their wounds.

A rehabilitation for which the rest of America will pay. Those who do
, that is.

In fact, the entire State of the Union was a pack of lies as you'll see.

Another divisive distraction from reality. If you recall, I cited Elon Musk of Space-X and TESLA explaining the reason why he succeeded. He said something to the effect that first you must try. The thing about trying is that one attempt won't do the trick. Two attempts won't do it. One hundred won't either.



Which is a good reason to blame the haves who do for what the have nots do not.



FILMS: The Horse Whisperer, Lost in Translation, Manny & Lo, Girl with a Pearl Earring, Iron Man, The Avengers, Captain America and others, Broadway Tony Winner, musician with two albums.

   Scarlett Johansson steps down as humanitarian ambassador
The reason? She felt that picking on a small nation in behalf of 1.5 billion Arabs who cannot stand anyone not like they is unreasonable; and that like any other people, Jews too, have a right to live and work wherever they please.
                                       — Jan. 30, 2014 3:44 PM EST

Scarlett Johansson   

FILE - In this Sept. 3, 2013 file photo, actress Scarlett Johansson poses for photographers on the red carpet for the screening of the film "Under The Skin" at the 70th edition of the Venice Film Festival in Venice, Italy. Johansson is ending her relationship with Oxfam International after being criticized over her support for an Israeli company that operates in the West Bank. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini, File)

JERUSALEM (AP) — Scarlett Johansson has parted ways with the international charity Oxfam because of a dispute over her work for SodaStream, a company operating in a West Bank settlement that features the Hollywood star in an ad that will air during the Super Bowl.

Johansson became the latest casualty of a widening campaign to boycott the settlements, drawing attention to a larger debate about whether Israel will become an international pariah, at a steep economic price, if it fails to reach a peace deal with the Palestinians. AGB: In other words, if Israel doesn't surrender its land, the failure of  the negotiations that Palestinians refused to enter for four years is Israel's fault. That the Arab World has already 99.4% of the land and 78% of the Palestinian Territories is Israel's Fault, for were it not Israel's Fault the Arabs would now possess 100% of the Mideast.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is formulating ideas for an Israeli-Palestinian framework agreement and is expected to present them next month. Israeli and Palestinian leaders have balked at some of his expected proposals and, if sticking to their positions, could derail what is widely seen as a last chance for ending a long-festering conflict.

Meanwhile, European officials have warned that Israel could face deepening economic isolation if it presses forward with the construction of settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, war-won lands the Palestinians want for their state. The fate of dozens of settlements, home to 550,000 Israelis, is a key sticking point in the talks.

Johansson, 29, stepped into that controversy this month when she agreed to become a global brand ambassador for SodaStream, a Tel Aviv-based company that makes home soda machines and has its main plant in an Israeli industrial park next to the West Bank settlement of Maaleh Adumim.

The actress, nominated four times for a Golden Globe, is to appear in a SodaStream ad during the Super Bowl on Sunday.

Her decision riled Oxfam International, a humanitarian aid organization for which she had served as global ambassador for eight years, helping raise donations for victims of natural disasters in Indonesia and the Philippines, among other causes.

On Wednesday, Johansson said in a statement that she was stepping down from that role, citing a "fundamental difference of opinion" with Oxfam. The actress, whose movies over the past two years include "The Avengers" and "Her," said she supports economic cooperation between "a democratic Israel and Palestine."

Oxfam accepted her resignation Thursday. The organization said it believes SodaStream and other businesses operating in West Bank settlements contribute to the "denial of rights of the Palestinian communities that we work to support." AGB: Oxfam also supports a Jihadist state in Jerusalem. By the way, inquiring minds want to know: At what point in history was Jerusalem the capital of an Arab nation that never existed in history? I thought so.

The charity said it opposes all trade with Israeli settlements, deemed illegal by most of the international community.

Johansson was one of 17 celebrity ambassadors for Oxfam. Others who are continuing in that role include the band Coldplay, pop singer Annie Lennox and U.S. actress Kristin Davis of "Sex and the City" fame, the organization said.

The Palestinian-led movement of boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) on Thursday welcomed the controversy surrounding Johansson, even though she decided to stay with SodaStream.

"Without doubt, the biggest loser in this well publicized BDS campaign was SodaStream, which was exposed to the whole world as an occupation profiteer," said Omar Barghouti, a leader of the movement founded in 2005 by Palestinian grassroots activists.

AGB: Actually the biggest losers are Palestinian Arabs who will lose their jobs and will soon receive unemployment and welfare checks via Barack Obama, making the American People the biggest losers.

In an interview with Associated Press Television News on Wednesday, SodaStream's chief executive, Dan Birnbaum, shrugged off the boycott campaign.


"To the best of my knowledge, we have not lost a single customer," he said. "If anything, it advances our awareness around the world, because people are talking about SodaStream."

He said the company does not want to "sacrifice" the jobs of 500 Palestinians who work in the SodaStream factory "for some political cause" of activist groups. The political activists have no interest in Palestinians making a living and bettering the Palestinian's lives.

Johansson was chastised by some and praised by others.

Barghouti said in a statement that she "reminds us of the few unprincipled artists who during the struggle against South African apartheid sold their souls and stood on the wrong side of history."

AGB: Unprincipled in the Palestinian's mind means she wants the Jewish State to survive and hang on to what was theirs to begin with; while her "principled" enemies want to see a field of dead Jews from the Jordan River to the Med. The principled ideology is JIHAD - the principled JIHAD of the non-apartheid areas of Gaza and the West Bank where ONLY Arabs can live and Jews cannot.

What is principled is not to have Jews live in your neighborhood.

The World Jewish Congress praised her as "a role model for others confronted with insidious anti-Israeli pressure."

A call placed to Johansson's representative by The Associated Press on Thursday was not immediately returned.

Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hard-line Likud Party played down the risks, saying Israel "has the tools to prevent boycotts." He did not elaborate.


Associated Press writers Ian Deitch in Jerusalem, Gregory Katz in London, Derrik J. Lang in Los Angeles and Ami Bentov in Tel Aviv contributed to this report.



Family Security Matters

Progressives Without Progress


They believe that we are about to run out of everything from energy to water to wealth and education and that like starving survivors on a lifeboat we have to redistribute everything.

The left is actually deeply conservative. It is difficult for people in countries being contested by the left to see this because they observe the left as revolutionary and destructive. But every attempted conquest is accompanied by violent disruptions. The domestic left destroys everything it does not control as part of a cultural war; not because it seeks an open society of perpetual creative ferment.

Once the left achieves its dream of absolute power in a nation, that nation becomes socially backward, technologically backward and culturally backward. There is a reason that the USSR, Cuba and North Korea were not producing compelling new cultural products for export the way that their sympathizers in Hollywood did and do. It's the same reason that they don't keep having revolutions.

The creative energies harnessed by the left are a revolutionary tool for achieving an ideal society. Once that miserably ideal society is achieved, everything is regimented and unplanned change is locked out of the equation because reactionary progressive utopias have to be relentlessly planned. Science and culture are forcibly slowed down. Individuality is discouraged. Conformity produces mediocrity in all fields. Time slows down and utopia sinks into its own progressive muck.


Family Security Matters

Liberalism Embraces the Soul of the Soviet Union

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD January 28, 2014

American liberalism, like all such political philosophies that ultimately rely on coercion for policy implementation, has completed its historical journey from altruism to totalitarianism.

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), like the Obama Administration, recommends that the Internal Revenue Service be used to suppress the activities of the Tea Party because its members engage in political speech with which he disagrees.

Schumer proves that it is not unintentional bureaucratic malpractice, but brute governmental force perpetrated by one political party against those holding alternative political beliefs in order to restrict free speech and impose its own ideology on the country.

Liberals, deeming themselves morally superior, have developed the capacity to ignore a record of consistent failure because they mistakenly equate intentions with results. For liberals, public policy becomes an extension of their own self-deception and intellectual dishonesty.

Like the Soviet politburo i.e. "just one more five-year plan and we will be there, comrade," liberals are driven to retain power in order to prove that if extensive government intervention is tried often enough the results will eventually match their intentions.



It is a form of fanaticism which leads liberals to adopt an ends justify the means mentality and to apply an increasing amount of force to elicit outcomes that are not possible using the strategies they employ.

Liberals cannot win arguments on the basis of empirical evidence or logic. In a debate, they must resort to lying about their own policies, personally discrediting their opponents or suppressing the truth.

To explain their policies liberals speak in euphemisms, vague expressions or outright lies used to disguise their intent and obscure the harsh reality that will result through the implementation of those policies. It is the expropriation of language as a prelude to the expropriation of property and individual liberty. It is the fictional "Newspeak" of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four come to life, a political construction to make lies sound truthful and tyranny appear acceptable.

Liberal morality is based on the selective exploitation of, but not a belief in words like "justice" and "rights." Whether it is social, economic, racial, immigrant, reproductive or whatever faux-noble camouflage is required, it is little more than a means to leverage the politics of tribalism.

Liberal policies can only succeed in an atmosphere of totalitarian uniformity of thought and behavior, where we celebrate our collective indoctrination and genuflect at the altar of leftist orthodoxy.

Common Core, for example, is being marketed as a national standard for educational excellence, not the lowest common denominator for socialist brainwashing and homogeneity.

Abortion becomes reproductive rights, racial quotas become diversity, illegal aliens become undocumented workers, socialized medicine becomes healthcare reform, taxes become investment, propaganda becomes news, lies become spin and free speech becomes hate speech.

In Mountain of Crumbs, a memoir of childhood in the 1960s and 1970s Soviet Union, Elena Gorokhova explains the meaning of "vranyo", the Russian word for a lie or half-truth:

"In Russia we played the ‘vranyo' game on a daily basis. The government lied to us, we knew they were lying, they knew we knew they were lying, but they kept lying anyway and we pretended to believe them. "

During the Soviet era, "vranyo" became the de facto way of life, an instrument of governmental coercion as well as a coping mechanism to endure both unbearable calamities and trivial annoyances of life in a totalitarian state.

A society cannot be built on a foundation of lies. In America today we are asked to accept Liberalism's promises of a bright future, which bear no resemblance to its disastrous present.

It is time to puncture that delusion.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ". He receives email at



Mammoth zing! Al Gore is the gift that keeps on giving for comedian Ruth Buzzi

January 28, 2014  08:06 AM

Forget pesky physics and law enforcement. “Laugh-In” comedian Ruth Buzzi continues to be unstoppable. Scientists say it's the coldest winter in 100 years, possibly entering another Ice Age. Get Al Gore's new book, "100 Ways to Cook Mammoth."— RUTH BUZZI                            SEA LEVEL 'RISE' SEEN BELOW









NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party) - from "Volksgemeinschaft" "People's Power" - uniting community; a forerunner of national community organizing and all Worker's Party movements.






This really should get your "gray matter" churning, even if you are an Obama fan.
I wouldn't want my hero to be made out to be a liar, would you?
For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox.
To find the information you need a calculator or a brain.
All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein).

4 Simple Questions

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time ?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya , East Africa ".

This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".
(check it below)
3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "Kaui Keolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been adopted until 1978?
More importantly: Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born.
That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest, I did that without a calculator.) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old.
Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes, or is an invented creature whose history and accomplishments are entirely fabricated, of whom we really know little or nothing -- except we see the forged and photoshopped documents and photos, the purpose for which, and his ascent to power, may be frightening?

And imagine this. This note is not from a birther but a mathematician. We know that the birthers are full of something and that math proves nothing. Right?

Nothing to see here folks, let's just    


State of the Union in 90 seconds

---------- Forwarded message ----------

John Porter;
To: Americans everywhere;
January 29, 2014:
       Thank you for your time and indulgence. I also thank an unknown writer for a valuable contribution to this information.
       We are being bombarded, by Barack Obama with the term "income inequality." We will hear it more and more through the November 4th elections. We also have heard from the leadership of the Democratic party and Barack Obama that there are two Americas, those with high income and those with low income. We heard it more than once in Obama's State of The Union political speech last night.
       I have concluded they are right, there are two Americas...The American people who work and those who don't. The American people who contribute and those who don't. It's not those who have and those who have not. It's those who do and those who do not. Don't confuse, those who "can not" with those who "do not." Some people meet their responsibility and do their duty as American citizens. They obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That is the divide, and there in lies the two Americas.
       It's not about "income inequality." It's about individual and civic irresponsibility. It's about the leadership of the Democrat Political Party and it's preaching of hatred and victimization in order to win elections. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves our country and it's Constitution. What I have said here is not intended to be mean spirited, nor is it verbal abuse. It is simply the truth, and I believe its time someone says it.
       "The politics of envy was on stark display a couple of weeks ago when president Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting "income inequality." He stated that "some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and that's not just."  Ladies and gentlemen, I submit for your honest consideration, Barack Obama in stating such beliefs, is preaching the rational of thievery, the other guy has it, you want it, take it. Or better yet, vote Democrat and Obama will take it for you. That is precisely the same rational that produced the destruction of Detroit. It is the same rational that is dividing America into two groups and destroying her.
       It produces a "fundamental change."  it is a deviation from American values and common sense because, in the end, it does not benefit the people who support it, but betrays them. President Obama and the Democrat leaders, by doing this, do not empower their followers, they enslave them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of ability and hope.
       I quote, "The president's premise, that you reduce "income inequality" by debasing the successful, seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices. Because, by and large, income variation in our society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences, or outcomes. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure." Success and failure usually manifest themselves in the levels of personal and family income.
       Different choices produce different outcomes. One man chooses to become a doctor and devotes his young adulthood in college and training and another chooses not to go to college and instead goes to work in a grocery store. Their will be a significant "income inequality" between the two. They both made a choice and those choices led to lives with an inequality of income, but their lives also had an inequality of effort put forth to produce that income. Every person reading this knows someone who makes more money than they do. Does that mean he or she cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth and give it to you?
       It is not inequality Obama intends to take away. It is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. The pursuit of happiness means much less when you face punishment from the government if your pursuit of, and finding, that happiness brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his rear and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime of poor and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Socialist Democrats preach equality of income as a right, while completely ignoring the inequality of effort that produced that income.
       In his speech, he said "Upward mobility in America has stopped."If Barack Obama gets his way, entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society. He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based upon using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our incomes. It is divided in our efforts to produce those incomes. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization.
       "The simple Law of the ye sow, so shall ye sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Barack Obama intends to make that a "fundamental change," to say The harder you work, the less you get. The less you work, the more you get. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.
       What Obama offered in his State of The Union speech was not a solution, but separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what Socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped neatly and tied with a bow. Two Americas...let us be reminded of the words of another president trying to unite America...."A house divided against itself cannot stand, Abraham Lincoln.
Obama is no Lincoln.

Please forward to all you wish by any means you wish. My information may be left in tact. I am unafraid.
May God bless America.
Until next time.
John Porter
118 Approach Drive
Harrison, Arkansas 72601


A Country Founded by Geniuses but Run by Idiots!

If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for entering and remaining in the country illegally — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If you have to get your parents’ permission to go on a field trip or to take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If you MUST show your identification to board an airplane, cash a check, buy liquor, or check out a library book and rent a video, but not to vote for who runs the government — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If the government wants to prevent stable, law-abiding citizens from owning gun magazines that hold more than ten rounds, but gives twenty
F-16 fighter jets to the crazy new leaders in Egypt — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If, in the nation’s largest city, you can buy two 16-ounce sodas, but not one 24-ounce soda, because 24-ounces of a sugary drink might make you fat — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If an 80-year-old woman or a three-year-old girl who is confined to a wheelchair can be strip-searched by the TSA at the airport, but a woman in a burka or a hijab is only subject to having her neck and head searched — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend trillions more — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If a seven-year-old boy can be thrown out of school for saying his teacher is “cute,” but hosting a sexual exploration or diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If hard work and success are met with higher taxes and more government regulation and intrusion, while not working is rewarded with Food Stamps, WIC checks, Medicaid benefits, subsidized housing, and free cell phones — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If the government’s plan for getting people back to work is to provide incentives for not working, by granting 99 weeks of unemployment checks, without any requirement to prove that gainful employment was diligently sought, but couldn’t be found — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If you pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the newest big-screen TV, while your neighbor buys iPhones, time shares, a wall-sized do-it-all plasma screen TV and new cars, and the government forgives his debt when he defaults on his mortgage — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If being stripped of your Constitutional right to defend yourself makes you more “safe” according to the government — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If the media panders to your openly socialist leader while the IRS targets groups with dissenting views— you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If your government 'cracks down' on legal gun sales to law abiding citizens while secretly supplying illegal guns to Mexican drug cartels— you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

If your local government (Chicago) outlawed gun ownership for 'the safety of its citizens' and now boasts the worst murder rate in the country — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.

What a country!

How about we give God a reason to continue blessing America?

2012 Fritz Edmunds


"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton

This transmission is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information and/or attachments that are privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, duplication or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify the sender by replying immediately to this transmission and destroying the transmission. To unsubscribe to this newsletter, please return this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject bar.

Fair Use Notice:
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sorry about this but to prevent vicious little bots from posting nasty stuff, we need moderation of comments. Thanks for your understanding.