Socialism has great advantages, and if anyone tells you otherwise...
...just hand them this.
You can discover the monumental advantages as you read on...
...AND LEARN ABOUT THE COUNTER-JIHAD MOVEMENT...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LEFTISTS FOR THE PEOPLE - see BELOW
And then we summon the nerve to examine the history.
For example, let's examine definitions found on the left page of your dictionaries:
NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party) - from "Volksgemeinschaft" "People's Power" - uniting community; a forerunner of national community organizing and all Worker's Party movements.
IN OTHER WORDS:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STILL DEAD AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, BUT THEIR STUPIDITY
Analysts say arm-twisting is unlikely to reduce Venezuela’s high homicide rate, which the United Nations ranks as the fifth worst globally, and they warn that Maduro’s campaign could be used as an excuse to further gag media criticism of the government.
“It’s a smoke screen to distract attention away from the real causes” of violence and crime, said Roberto Briceno Leon of the Venezuelan Observatory of Violence, which estimates the country’s murder rate has quadrupled in 15 years of socialist rule.
http://nypost.com/2014/01/21/violence-that-claimed-beauty-queen-linked-to-soap-operas/
THE BENEFITS OF SOCIALISM PICTURED
CAN IT GET BETTER THAN THIS?
Venezuelan beauty queen Monica Spear slain- CNN
MURDERED BY SOCIALISM AND THE SOCIETY THAT SOCIALISM SPAWNED
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted: 23 Jan 2014 02:05 PM PST New York City mayors excel at banning everything from salt to carriages, but they are not very good at cleaning up the streets and roads after a snowstorm. NEW YORK'S FINEST UNDER ORDERS FROM COMMUNIST MAYOR BEAT UP 84 YEAR OLD FOR JAYWALKING There are two ways of looking at a major city; as a mechanical matter of buildings, streets and sewers to be maintained or as a social problem of misbehaving people. The mayors of the mechanical city understand that they need to clean the streets, but the mayors of the social problem think they have to fix the people. Mayor Bloomberg flubbed the snow challenge badly. Instead of preparing road salt, he banned salt in restaurants. Instead of having a snow strategy for the winter, he had a Global Warming strategy for the next fifty years. Instead of doing his job, he kept trying to transform the people. And his successor is no better. Bill de Blasio's focus after his petty and mean-spirited inauguration was a ban on carriage horses in Central Park at the behest of a real estate developer who backed his campaign and has his eye on their stables, a tussle over who will get the credit for Pre-K with Governor Cuomo and the beating of Kang Wong, an 84-year-old man, over a jaywalking ticket. The media had lavished praise on Bill de Blasio after his first photo op shoveling snow and celebrated his call to implement Vision Zero, a Swedish plan to cut traffic fatalities to zero, even though there was no remote possibility of reducing traffic fatalities to zero in a major city filled with cars, pedestrians, cyclists and even pedicabs. Instead of preparing for the snow, Team De Blasio launched a crackdown on jaywalking in Manhattan where three-quarters of the residents don't own cars. And so the Upper East Side, which didn't vote for Bill de Blasio, became a snarled and unplowed mess and the jaywalking enforcers put an 84-year-old man in the hospital after arresting him for the tall order of "jaywalking, resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration and disorderly conduct." |
LINK: Totalitarians of New York
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OBAMA'S NEW TERM FOR INCOME INEQUALITY WILL BE "OPPORTUNITY". WHICH MEANS IF ONE LOOKED INTO IT FURTHER, THAT A GANGBANGER SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RUN GM OR GE.
I MEAN, WHY NOT?
INCOME INEQUALITY? 13% OF AMERICANS ACCORDING TO THE LATEST POLLS CARE.
Poll: Voters Reject Income Inequality Politics
THE REST SIMPLY DON'T CARE. INCOME INEQUALITY IS A FABRICATED ISSUE.
IT'S NOT THE AMERICAN WAY. THE AMERICAN WAY IS TO CLEAR THE PATH TO OPPORTUNITY.
NOT TO EQUALITY OF RESULTS.
FREE MARKETS, NO GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE, AND NO CLASS WARFARE DOES EXACTLY THAT.
AMERICANS DON'T WANT INCOME EQUALITY; THEY WANT OPPORTUNITY EQUALITY.
BUT - PERSONALLY - I THINK THAT LOW INCOMES HURT THE ECONOMY. PEOPLE WITH NO MONEY CAN'T BUY ANYTHING...THEY CANNOT BECOME CONSUMERS. BUYING FUELS OUR
OF COURSE
From David Horowitz:
Barack Obama and his left wing political machine in Congress have decided on the theme of their next attack on America and conservatives. It is inequality. Our nation's economy is struggling, Obamacare is the most hated piece of legislation in decades, al Qaeda is resurgent throughout the Middle East and North Africa, and the U.S. is throwing Israel under the bus by allowing Iran to proceed with its nuclear power.
And what is our President's response? What is the big issue that he has decided to showcase in 2014? Inequality. Another attack on America as a land of haves and have nots where the haves always get more and the have nots always get less.
With his poll numbers plummeting, hope evaporating, and change only for the worse, the President tries to change the subject by doubling down on class warfare. After having spent five years coming up with policies that have taxed and regulated the job creators out of business, redistributed income to no one's benefit and everyone's detriment, convinced hundreds of thousands to give up looking for work altogether, and divided the people of this country more starkly than ever before, Obama finds the villain.
It is America itself, with a cruel capitalist system that enriches the few at the expense of the many.
JIM COLES: There are no haves and have nots. There are the haves and the have mores.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LET'S SEE THE DOCUMENT THAT SAYS NO SUCH THING!
The vision of the left is not just a vision of the world. For many, it is also a vision of themselves — a very flattering vision of people trying to save the planet, rescue the exploited, create “social justice” and otherwise be on the side of the angels. This is an exalting vision that few are ready to give up, or to risk on a roll of the dice, which is what submitting it to the test of factual evidence amounts to. Maybe that is why there are so many fact-free arguments on the left, whether on gun control, minimum wages, or innumerable other issues — and why they react so viscerally to those who challenge their vision.
Leftists: For the ‘People’?
One of the things that attracted me to the political left, as a young man, was a belief that leftists were for “the people.” Fortunately, I was also very interested in the history of ideas — and years of research in that field repeatedly brought out the inescapable fact that many leading thinkers on the left had only contempt for “the people.”
That has been true from the 18th century to the present moment. Even more surprising, I discovered over the years that leading thinkers on the opposite side of the ideological spectrum had more respect for ordinary people than people on the left who spoke in their name.
Leftists like Rousseau, Condorcet or William Godwin in the 18th century, Karl Marx in the 19th century or Fabian socialists like George Bernard Shaw in England and American Progressives in the 20th century saw the people in a role much like that of sheep, and saw themselves as their shepherds.
Another disturbing pattern turned up that is also with us to the present moment. From the 18th century to today, many leading thinkers on the left have regarded those who disagree with them as being not merely factually wrong but morally repugnant. And again, this pattern is far less often found among those on the opposite side of the ideological spectrum.
The visceral hostility toward Sarah Palin by present day liberals, and the gutter level to which some descend in expressing it, is just one sign of a mindset on the left that goes back more than two centuries.
T.R. Malthus was the target of such hostility in the 18th and early 19th centuries. When replying to his critics, Malthus said, “I cannot doubt the talents of such men as Godwin and Condorcet. I am unwilling to doubt their candor.”
But William Godwin’s vision of Malthus was very different. He called Malthus “malignant,” questioned “the humanity of the man,” and said “I profess myself at a loss to conceive of what earth the man was made.”
This asymmetry in responses to people with different opinions has been too persistent, for too many years, to be just a matter of individual personality differences.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE RESULT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA A PERSON COULD NOT DEAL WITH!
WATCH IT HERE FROM WESTERN JOURNALISM CENTER:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VC4ea24_mQ#t=0
Did 9/11 traumatize the U.S. into Jihad-Denial?
Americans’ Stockholm Syndrome With Islam?
This week’s Glazov Gang was hosted by Ann-Marie Murrell and joined by Beverly Zaslow, a documentary film producer, Michael Hausam, a conservative writer and activist, and Nonie Darwish, the author of The Devil We Don’t Know.
The Gang gathered to discuss Americans’ Stockholm Syndrome With Islam? The discussion occurred in Part I and focused on how 9/11 traumatized the U.S. into Jihad-Denial. The dialogue occurred within the context of English-Language Media Ignores Breivik’s Coming-Out As A Nazi. (The title of Robert Spencer’s recent piece).
The
In Part II, the Gang focuses on: Obamacare — An “Islamic Trojan Horse”?
Watch both parts of the two-part series below:
Read MoreIsraeli Prof. Denied Honorary Degree for Being too ‘Right-Wing’
Dimitry Shumsky is a young anti-Israel far Leftist whose diatribes litter the far Leftist fringe media in Israel, especially the leftist daily Haaretz. Since 2009, according to his own published resume, he has held a tenure-track appointment at the Department of the History of the Jewish People at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Shumsky in Haaretz on January 20, 2014 joins the cat fight of the far Left in Israel over the decision by the University of Haifa to veto an honorary PhD to Prof. Robert Aumann.
The Nobel-Prize winning economist Aumann was denied an honorary PhD by the University of Haifa on grounds that he holds conservative political opinions.AGB: As I said, socialism has great advantages.
IN CASE YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT, IT'S THE JEW'S FAULT.
[Take as required. In Islam, deception (taqiyya) is permissible, and often encouraged, in any interaction between Muslims and unbelievers, especially Jews. Maybe that’s where Barack Hussein Obama got the idea that it’s OK to lie to America about Islam and its permanent Jihad. df]
dailycaller.com, 1/21/2014
Muslim anti-Semitism is only decades old, Obama claims
The Quran’s words created and maintain Islamic anti-Semitism, which is so ubiquitous that even sects of Sunni and Shia Muslims who are trying to kill each other agree that Jews are to blame for their fighting – Andrew Bostom
By Neil Munro:
Experts are scoffing at President Barack Obama’s apparent belief that widespread Muslim hatred of Jews is only decades old.
“Obama reveals that he has no idea, or doesn’t want to give the impression that he has any idea, about the reality of Islamic anti-Semitism,” said Robert Spencer, the author of many books on Islamic ideas and director of Jihad Watch.
“Anti-Semitism is hard-wired into Islam,” from its origins before 700, said Andrew Bostom, author of three books about Islam, including “The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism,” which lists centuries of anti-Semitic hatred, murders, pogroms and apartheid-like discrimination.
Intellectuals, politicians and diplomats are loath to admit the centrality of anti-Semitism in Islamic beliefs, because it fuels conflict with Israel and the West and it can’t be fixed by Westerners, Bostom said. ”You’re dealing with an intractable situation, and people hate intractable situations,” he said, adding “diplomats are the worst.”
In an interview with The New Yorker magazine, Obama described the Muslim hatred of Israel as byproduct of recent fights, not as a consequence of Islam’s doctrinal objection to any Jewish government.
I was privileged to join Clare Lopez, Mark Langfan, and Dr. Walid Phares for this panel presentation jointly sponsored by The Endowment for Middle East Truth and the Center for Security Policy
Using photos, text, and clips, the video depicts how jihadism, and canonical Islamic antisemitism motivate the relentless effort to destroy the State of Israel from a shared Sunni-Shiite perspective. Featured, prominently, is an end of times messianic theme re-activated with fervor in Islam, for at least a century now, since the advent of the modern Zionist movement. Uniquely Shiite “infidel impurity” (so-called “najis”) regulations and their impact are also explored in the context of centuries of Iranian Shiite theocratic rule.
Video of My January 8th Briefing at the Senate Office Building, “What Are Iran’s True Intentions?”
January 18th, 2014 by Andrew Bostom
--
"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton
Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.
--
"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton
Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.