"Recently, over a thousand of our last updates have been returned as spam. Since we don't sell anything and never include any of the very few ads which are on our website in any email, spam is something TPATH never deals in. So as we investigated we found that 99% of the kicked back emails came from Optimum and AOL subscribers. Then upon further review we found that a company called "Cloudmark" was blocking the email.
They decide what you can receive in your inbox. And you never know what has been censored.
If you believe in the US Constitution and a free America, you may be obligated to support this organization and the massive costs they are undertaking to preserve our nation. PLEASE, send them any donation you can! And distribute this letter and my comments to your clubs and organizations. TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK, send your donations to the address below! - AGB
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc.
90 S. Swan Street, Ste. 395
Albany, New York 12210
Fax: 518-274-4972E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Here's Tom King, the president's letter:
Today, the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association (NYSRPA) is proud to announce that its membership has nearly doubled since the passage of the NY SAFE Act. NYSRPA President Tom King said, “Our membership has increased from (22,000?) to 41,000+ individual members in the space of one year. This is an extraordinary jump, and when you factor in the clubs and other organizations that are also members, we are a force to be reckoned with.” King noted that NYSRPA, the nation’s oldest National Rifle Association (NRA) affiliate, is now the largest, surpassing the Texas affiliate. King, an NRA board member, said he looks forward to drawing attention to this when he meets with his Texas Colleagues at the next NRA board meeting.
King cites the passage of the NY SAFE Act as the primary reason for the exponential increase in membership. “The NY SAFE Act is one of the most egregious assaults ever perpetrated on the Constitutional Rights of New Yorkers and people are fed up. I would point out that the governor recently said that advocates for the Second Amendment, traditional marriage, and the right to life, have forfeited their right to residency in this state. This is simply outrageous, and while we are strictly a Second Amendment advocacy organization, I can appreciate other organization’s consternation at such hubris.”
The NYSRPA is currently in the process of litigating against the NY SAFE Act. “We had a recent decision in the Western NY federal judicial district that bodes well for our cause,” King. “The court ruled that the seven round limit on magazine capacity violated the Second Amendment and this decision has left the door open for a favorable ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. Said King, “NYSRPA has already spent over $450,000 in legal fees and is prepared to bear whatever cost is required to defeat the NY SAFE Act. To quote the great Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. ‘we shall overcome’.”
Cogito ergo sum armati
NO ONE WAS RESPONSIBLE. NO ONE WAS PUNISHED.
THE AUDACITY OF THE INSIPID
Since Barack Obama has been in the White House,
Things have gotten so bad that a number of retired generals are publicly speaking out about the “purge” of the U.S. military that they believe is taking place. As you will see below, dozens of highly decorated military leaders have been dismissed from their positions over the past few years. So why is this happening? What is going on right now is absolutely crazy – especially during a time of peace. Is there a deliberate attempt to “reshape” the military and remove those who don’t adhere to the proper “viewpoints”? Does someone out there feel a need to get officers that won’t “cooperate” out of the way? Throughout world history, whatever comes next after a “military purge” is never good. If this continues, what is the U.S. military going to look like in a few years?
Now this trend appears to be accelerating.
A guy walked into a crowded bar, waving his 1911 Colt .45 with an 8 round magazine and yelled,
"Who in here has been screwing my wife?"
A voice from the back of the bar yelled back, "You need more ammo."
NEITHER HAVE I!
ARLENE KUSHNER writes from JERUSALEM
Just today the American secretary of state, in Germany, indicated that a failure of the peace talks will lead to global boycotts and delegitimization of Israel.
This sort of threat by Kerry raises my own blood pressure more than a bit. He’s a man without principles who will stoop to anything in an effort to achieve his goals. And here I would like to speak for myself:
I will tighten my belt, figuratively, and do without a good deal, were there to be economic boycotts that reduced the standard of living here, rather than see a deal struck with the PLO in any terms whatsoever. For me, and many many others, this is a no-brainer. We will not be intimidated.
And this is precisely what Bennett said (and I am pleased to quote him yet again, emphasis added):
I want to clarify to all those giving advice: the country has yet to be born that will give up its land because of economic threats, and we won't either. Only security will bring financial stability, not a terror state next to the Ben Gurion Airport.
"We expect our friends in the world to stand by our side, against the anti-Semitic boycott attempts against Israel, and not to be the voice of the boycotts. We've known in the past and know today how to stay strong."
One can never prepare too early for the rising seas, so you may want to consider selling your beach front property, just to be safe, in say 25,000 years or so.
For example, during the 100 year period ..... global temperatures have increased by just under one degree. With none of that increase coming during the last 17 years of profound rise in CO2 levels. To put this into terms relative to a typical human life span, if the average temperature when you were born, and you are now 50 years old, was 68 degrees, you would now be sweltering in an unbearable 68 1/2 degrees. And if you lived to be 100, you would have to endure as much as 69 degrees. We could determine by these numbers that the End of the World is rushing up on us as soon as 348 million years at which point Obamacare kicks in.
Let's check the facts and run the numbers.
Commentary, facts and backup By:
February 2, 2014 ~TPATH~ As a result of this past week's compilation of deception and lies, better known as the State of the Union Address, where the fabrication of man made global warming was added to the list of other falsehoods, we felt it was time to re-post this earlier article. We have added a few things and edited others for clarity. So even if you read this on the original posting, you might like to review it.
Carbon Dioxide is not a toxic or poisonous compound:
If it were, anyone drinking soda, beer or champagne would be dead or sick. Co2 is as vital to all life on this planet as is oxygen. Without Co2, plants and vegetation would not exist nor would the animals which feed on it. Algae and plankton (parts of which are plant life) would not exist, nor would the fish and marine mammals which feed on them.
In fact, in experiments, when Co2 levels in controlled environments were doubled and tripled the amounts found in the atmosphere, vegetables, fruits and all vegetation grew larger and healthier than those subjected to (normal) levels.
Co2 is heavier and denser than oxygen by almost 4 times. For that reason carbon dioxide exists at the highest percentage levels at or near sea level. As a result, other gases such as ozone, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and water vapor reside higher in the atmosphere and are much more likely to trap thermal temperatures, better known as the greenhouse effect.
It is a fact that Co2 in very high levels, within a sealed enclosure would displace oxygen and could therefore cause suffocation. That person will not have been poisoned, he will simply have expired do to the lack of oxygen. Far different from ozone, methane and carbon monoxide, which are truly toxic compounds.
Higher amounts of Co2, in any possible percentage, does not effect global temperature:
Actually it's the converse. Global temperatures effect Co2 levels. Analyzing core samples have proven that Co2 percentages, spanning centuries, increase following rises in global temperature, not prior to it. This one fact alone, the one the hoaxsters work most diligently to obscure, puts an end to the man made global warming charade.
Co2 has not risen significantly over the last 100 years of the industrial age:
At the turn of the 19th century Co2 levels were .0038% of the atmosphere. The latest global reading shows levels are now .0045%. That means, even if mankind was causing any significant rise in Co2 levels, which there is no proof of, it has risen just .0007% in well over a century.
Referencing the core samples above, Co2 levels, 100's of years before humans could have had any effect on them, were as much as 2 and 3 times higher than the present, and global temperatures were many degrees lower.
Global temperature increases in relation to Co2 elevations:
If Co2 levels increased because of humans and if that rise created elevated global temperatures, which neither do, at the rate humans are supposedly rising Co2 levels and comparing the actual global temperature increase during the .0007% rise in Co2, the danger to mankind's existence would certainly not be imminent.
For example, during the 100 year period referred to in an above paragraph, global temperatures have increased by just under one degree. With none of that increase coming during the last 17 years. To put this into terms relative to a typical human life span, if the average temperature when you were born, and you are now 50 years old, was 68 degrees, you would now be sweltering in an unbearable 68 1/2 degrees. And if you lived to be 100, you would have to endure as much as 69 degrees.
Or to put it another way, if humans were the factor in Co2 increases, and at the rate we have been accused of increasing it, it would take 1,425 years to increase Co2 levels by just 1%. (Note: There is no proof man is responsible for this latest rise. We are using their numbers simply to show the absurdity.)
Man's contribution to Co2:
Still supposing the Co2 humans are putting into the atmosphere is actually contributing to global warming, we have prepared some very interesting calculations. This is where running the numbers gets to be fun. Unless of course if facts, calculations and common sense get in the way of emotionally driven ideology.
During any given point in a year there is an approximated 186 billion tons of Co2 on the earth. These estimated totals include accumulated Co2 in the land, sea and air. Incorporating the data the hoaxsters love to quote, ....."humans and human activity contribute 6 billion tons annually to the planet's Carbon Dioxide totals", by running the numbers we come up with some very interesting facts.
Keeping in mind we are using estimates provided by the leftist group known as The Sierra Club and taking into account the agenda they have, it's not difficult to imagine they just may have jacked up their estimates. Those of their ilk have been known to manipulate data and write computer programs to produce predetermined results. Be that as it may, we used their data and have come up with these results.
Here is some math:
6 billion tons divided by 186 billion tons = .032 x 100 = 3.2%
Which means, during any one year period man's contribution to Co2 levels is 3.2%
Now, let's say we are really concerned about cutting back on the "human carbon footprint", here is a game plan to save the planet. Suppose.....
- We eliminate half of the world population of 7.2 billion people to 3.6 billion.
- We shut down half of the world's factories and industry.
- We remove half of all cars, trains, trucks, tractors, ships and planes from use.
- We close and shutter half of every fuel consuming building in the world, which would include businesses, schools, hospitals, government buildings (not a bad idea there), and of course half the homes on the planet.
Man's yearly carbon footprint = 3.2% of the total
Removing half of human activity would reduce that total by .016 x 100 = 1.6%
The average Co2 percentage is .0045%
1.6% (man's adjusted contribution) of .0045 = .00072%
.0045% (-) .00072% = .00378%
What do these numbers mean? Two things. The first thing it proves, is if half of mankind and everything associated with it were removed from existence, the amount of Co2 would be reduced by .00072%.
The second thing it proves is man-made global warming is nothing more than hoax and a sinister scheme to confiscate from the productive, skim off huge amounts and then distribute the stolen wealth to those who have not earned it.
Polar ice and sea levels:
Let's run the numbers on some of these global warming alarms.
A. We have been told that 12 cubic miles of Greenland's ice is melting away every year and that will cause the sea levels to rise by 24 feet. Algore has warned, by the winter of 2014, there would be no ice on the north pole. Since that breathlessly proffered prognostication has not exactly come to fruition as the northern hemisphere is suffering the coldest winter in over 100 years, they needed a new explanation to explain the falsity of the old one. Enter, the Polar Vortex. This, according to them, explains how global warming is forcing warm air up to the pole and the result is that frigid weather is being forced south. There you have it, global warming is causing global freezing. No word from Algore as to how a 2014 no ice covered north pole is able to freeze the entire northern hemisphere. But he's working on it.
Now, back to the sea levels. Let's run a few more numbers. Greenland, at last estimate, has 604,800 cubic miles of ice. If, as they say, 12 cubic miles are melting every year, get your row boats ready, because at that rate it will take 50,400 years before it's all melted. A bit deeper into the future than 2014. One can never prepare too early so you may want to consider selling your beach front property, just to be safe, in say 25,000 years or so.
B. Of course, typical with most information the warming hoaxsters pretend to have calculated, this 24 foot rise is also much exaggerated. We have done real and complete calculations based upon the world's connected waterways. Calculating the density of ice as compared to water and the total ice mass of the entire northern hemisphere. What we found was the sea levels would rise just under 11 feet, but only after more than 2,500 generations, if it continued to melt at the rate they claim. Which we see now, darn it, is just not happening.
Here is the basis, without showing all the calculations here, which you can do yourself or see ours upon request. There are 150,826,300 square miles of connected sea level bodies of water on this earth. If every single particle of ice, in the entire northern hemisphere were to melt, the sea levels would rise just 19 feet. This takes into account that large percentages of northern ice are incorporated in the oceans and seas. Water volume increases by about 20% when frozen. A large percentage of all melting ice resides in the oceans and seas and the volume would actually decrease where that is so. Those areas would actually see a negative rise in sea levels.
A little about what really causes global warming.
Hint, its a big hot ball in the sky.
As we have shown, Co2 plays no role in planetary heating. So what does?
Our planet is kept warm or cold by three major natural phenomenons.
A. The Sun
c. H2o (Water or more precisely, water vapor)
When the sun shines, it not only creates thermal heat which reaches the earth, but more importantly, solar particles crash into the oxygen in the upper atmosphere and creates Ozone. These solar particles vary in intensity as a result of sun activity known as solar flares. The more active the solar flares, the more intense the particle collisions and the more Ozone is created. Less solar activity, less Ozone. Less Ozone = a cooler earth, more Ozone = a warmer earth.
Ozone is the number two rated greenhouse gas which follows the number one greenhouse gas, no its not Co2, its H20, humidity. Ozone serves two major purposes.
- The most important is its ability to filter harmful radiation from the sun. Without it, all life on this planet would cease to exist.
- The second is its ability to block echoed or bounced heat from leaving the earth and dissipating into outer space.
Bad news for man made global warming pirates:
The sun has fairly consistent cycles of solar flare activity with long and short periods of more and less activity. The sun has been moving towards a less active period for several years now, and if patterns of the past continue, many years of less active solar flares are ahead. Which in simple terms means, it's going to get cold.
As we continue to cool, as we have been doing for several years, you will need to decide if it's the Polar Vortex or the lack of a Solar Vortex.
February 2, 2014 ~TPATH
CONTACT TPATH HERE
POLAR VORTEX PART I
READ IT HERE
"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton
This transmission is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information and/or attachments that are privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, duplication or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify the sender by replying immediately to this transmission and destroying the transmission. To unsubscribe to this newsletter, please return this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject bar.
Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.