Moving to ...

Moved to Pressing For Truth In seeking truth, one does not find it by these immature and primitive methods. See RULES FOR COMMENTS (Right Sidebar)

Search This Blog

FrontPage Magazine » FrontPage

Monday, January 6, 2014

THE ULTIMATUM




​For THE ULTIMATUM you will have to see later... below!

YOU MAY BE WHOM YOU THINK YOU ARE, BUT PERHAPS NOT.

Ever watch The Twilight Zone? The stories are all written to a formula. You are presented with a set of circumstances which seem completely natural, comprehensible and familiar. Only something is wrong. There's an element that doesn't make sense, doesn't fit. This builds up to a climax until an epiphanic moment when you're mentally zoomed out to see a wider truth you never expected. Suddenly you realize all of your prior assumptions were wrong, what was really happening was entirely different only you had no way of knowing it. Only then does it all become perfectly clear and it's the opposite of what you'd thought before. The truth comes as a complete surprise.
When you step out of that moment and back into reality, your epiphany will  cause you to retreat from your previously-held belief system and realize you've been had.

- Mark Fisher @ PS Tracks

It's true. You've been had. Everything you believed is simply not true.
All you've experienced are SNIPPETS of factoids, not a truth that can only be revealed in a context.
The context of just about everything you know is missing.
And factoids are not truths.
They are merely factoids that just appear to be truths.
You are...and have lived for your entire life...in The Twilight Zone.


A READER, A PHD, OBSERVED: "The readers of SNIPPETS' newsletters will gain a fundamental knowledge greater than what he learned in graduate school and possibly through his whole life."

FAR MORE CRUCIAL THAN WHAT WE KNOW OR DO NOT KNOW IS WHAT WE DO NOT WANT TO KNOW. – Eric Hoffer

-------------------------------------

AVOIDING KNOWLEDGE IS ALIKE TRYING TO AVOID GRAVITY,
EXCEPT WITH THE FIRST ONE CAN DELIBERATELY MAKE ONESELF EXEMPT!
IT IS aka WILLFUL IGNORANCE. INTELLECTUAL LAZINESS. OR PELOSISM:
"You will find out what's in the law when we pass it."



          

JOHN MAULDIN writes:

For all of measurable human history up until the year 1750, nothing happened that mattered.

This isn't to say history was stagnant, or that life was only grim and blank, but the well-being of average people did not perceptibly improve. All of the wars, literature, love affairs, and religious schisms, the schemes for empire-making and ocean-crossing and simple profit and freedom, the entire human theater of ambition and deceit and redemption took place on a scale too small to register, too minor to much improve the lot of ordinary human beings. In England before the middle of the eighteenth century, where industrialization first began, the pace of progress was so slow that it took 350 years for a family to double its standard of living. In Sweden, during a similar 200-year period, there was essentially no improvement at all. By the middle of the eighteenth century, the state of technology and the luxury and quality of life afforded the average individual were little better than they had been two millennia earlier, in ancient Rome.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"The first order of business (and creativity) is to try." - says Elon Musk, CEO of SPACE-X and TESLA Motors, inventor of PayPal, interviewed on CNNs Fareed Zakaria Jan. 5, 2014, a full year after SNIPPETS covered Elon Musk in these newsletters.

"Think of things that have not been done before...and if you can't, you haven't tried hard enough."

   


The Primacy of Human Capital

Thoughts from the Frontline

It is not just that Gordon and others miss the importance of information and entrepreneurial effort in industrial revolutions, missing the forest for the trees. It is that they miss the most important factor of all: capital. But not capital in the sense of money. I am thinking of capital in the more important way that Nobel laureate Gary Becker describes it: as human capital.

It is the investments we have made in ourselves that have been the true source of economic growth. Education, training, information sharing, the transfer of knowledge have all been fundamental in the human experiment. The more open a society becomes, the more it shares its information and knowledge and the fruits of its labors, and the more empowered its people and the more productive its civilization become.

As Isaac Newton said, "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." In Newton's time, there were a handful of giants; today there are thousands. And because of their ubiquity, most go unnoticed. The division of labor, the most significant of Adam Smith's insights, means that there are just so many more small but important realms of human endeavor where giants can roam and have an impact. When was the last time we celebrated the giants of material sciences? Who are the Newtons of the world of ceramics? We may not be able to name them, yet their work has a profound impact on our lives. I daresay that our Killer Robot would not be possible without their seminal work. Or the work of thousands of other innovators.

The End of Growth?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
​
 
BITE THE BULLET!

DO   YOU  THINK   YOU   CAN   CUT   BACK   ON   YOUR   EXPENSES   AT   THE   SAME   %   RATIO TO  FOLLOW  OBAMA'S  LEAD?  

​
I'm going to bite the bullet too. Will you join me?​
   

 

President Obama ordered the cabinet to cut $100,000,000.00 ($100 million) from the $3,500,000,000,000.00 ($3.5 trillion) federal budget.

 

I'm so impressed by this sacrifice that I have decided to do the same thing with my personal budget.  I spend about $2,000 a month on groceries, household expenses, medicine, utilities, etc., but it's time to get out the budget cutting axe, go through my expenses, and cut back.

 

I'm going to cut my spending at exactly the same ratio (1/35,000) of my total budget. After doing the math, it looks like instead of spending $2,000 a month, I'm going to have to cut that number by six cents.  Yes, I'm going to have to get by with $1,999.94, but that's what sacrifice is all about.

 

I'll just have to do without some things, that are, frankly, luxuries – six cents worth.


 

Did this President actually think no one would do the math? Please send this to everyone on your list so people understand how idiotic a $100 million cut is in a $3.5 trillion budget

​!​

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation...

One is by sword...

The other is by debt."

John Adams 1826

 



​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​

 
You may be too young to remember this. But some of us do and it appears to be coming true
​.
Remember: If you can't learn from history, you will not learn from anything.​
KRUSHEV'S FAMOUS QUOTE!
 
Nikita Khrushev's Quote September 29, 1959

 
DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN Nikita Khrushev APPEARED AT THE U.N.
AND BANGED HIS SHOE ON THE PODIUM? I DO!!
THIS WAS HIS ENTIRE QUOTE:

​       ​

 
 
WE'RE ALMOST THERE!!!
 
 
 
 
 

​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​


​MONTHS AGO SNIPPETS UNCOVERED THE REAL PURPOSE OF OBAMACARE.

IT WAS NOT CARE. IT WAS NOT HEALTH. IT WAS NOT A PLAN TO BENEFIT PEOPLE.

IT WAS A PLAN TO MAKE EVERY INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE PLAN PERPETUALLY PROFITABLE.
AND IMMUNE TO FAILURE. PREFERRED TREATMENT. PERPETUALLY.
IT IS ABOUT AN INSURANCE COMPANY BAILOUT.
IT'S ABOUT CRONY CAPITALISM.

SNIPPETS HAD CONNECTED ONE OF THE LARGEST INSURANCE COMPANY INVESTORS TO THE PLAN AND THE WHYFORS FOR HIS ADVOCACY OF IT.

WARREN BUFFETT
MADE MOST OF HIS MONEY BY INVESTING IN INSURANCE COMPANIES.

LAST OBSERVATION ABOUT WARREN BUFFETT.
HE'S SMARTER THAN YOU!​
AND FAR MORE CORRUPT.




WaPo, January 2


Stop the bailout — now

By Charles Krauthammer


First order of business for the returning Congress: The No Bailout for Insurance Companies Act of 2014.

Make it one line long: "Sections 1341 and 1342 of the Affordable Care Act are hereby repealed."

End of bill. End of bailout. End of story.


Why do we need it? On Dec. 18, the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers was asked what was the administration's Plan B if, because of adverse selection (enrolling too few young and healthies), the insurance companies face financial difficulty.

Jason Furman wouldn't bite. "There's a Plan A," he replied. Enroll the young.

But of course there's a Plan B. It's a government bailout.


Administration officials can't say it for political reasons. And they don't have to say it because it's already in the Affordable Care Act, buried deep.

First, Section 1341, the "reinsurance" fund collected from insurers and self-insuring employers at a nifty $63 a head. (Who do you think the cost is passed on to?) This yields about $20 billion over three years to cover losses.

Then there is Section 1342, the "risk corridor" provision that mandates a major taxpayer payout covering up to 80 percent of insurance-company losses.

Never heard of these? That's the beauty of passing a bill of such monstrous length. You can insert a chicken soup recipe and no one will notice.

Nancy Pelosi was right: We'd have to pass the damn thing to know what's in it. Well, now we have and now we know.

The whole scheme was risky enough to begin with — getting enough enrollees and making sure 40 percent were young and healthy. Obamacare is already far behind its own enrollment estimates. But things have gotten worse. The administration has been changing the rules repeatedly — with every scrimmage-line audible raising costs and diminishing revenue.

First, it postponed the employer mandate. Then it exempted from the individual mandate people whose policies were canceled (by Obamacare). And for those who did join the exchanges, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is "strongly encouraging" insurers — during the "transition" — to cover doctors and drugs not included in their clients' plans.

The insurers were stunned. Told to give free coverage. Deprived of their best customers. Forced to offer stripped-down "catastrophic" plans to people age 30 and over (contrary to the law). These dictates, complained an insurance industry spokesman, could "destabilize" the insurance market.

Translation: How are we going to survive this? Shrinking revenues and rising costs could bring on the "death spiral" — an unbalanced patient pool forcing huge premium increases (to restore revenue) that would further unbalance the patient pool as the young and healthy drop out.

End result? Insolvency — before which the insurance companies will pull out of Obamacare.

Solution? A huge government bailout. It's Obamacare's escape hatch. And — surprise, surprise — it's already baked into the law.

Which is why the GOP needs to act. Obamacare is a Rube Goldberg machine with hundreds of moving parts. Without viable insurance companies doing the work, it falls apart. No bailout, no Obamacare.

Such a bill would be overwhelmingly popular because Americans hate fat-cat bailouts of any kind. Why should their tax dollars be spent not only saving giant insurers but also rescuing this unworkable, unbalanced, unstable, unpopular money-pit of a health-care scheme?

The GOP House should pass it and send it to Harry Reid's Democratic Senate. Democrats know it could be fatal for Obamacare. The only alternative would be single-payer. And try selling that to the country after the spectacularly incompetent launch of — and subsequent widespread disaffection with — mere semi-nationalization.

Do you really think vulnerable Democrats up for reelection will vote for a bailout? And who better to slay Obamacare than a Democratic Senate — liberalism repudiating its most important creation of the last 50 years.

Want to be even bolder? Attach the anti-bailout bill to the debt ceiling. That and nothing else. Dare the president to stand up and say: "I'm willing to let the country default in order to preserve a massive bailout for insurance companies."

In the past, Republicans made unrealistic and unpopular debt-ceiling demands — and lost badly. They learned their lesson. Last year, Republicans presented one simple unassailable debt-ceiling demand — that the Senate pass its first budget in four years.

Who could argue with that? The Senate capitulated within two days.


Who can argue with no bailout? Let the Senate Democrats decide: Support the bailout and lose the Senate. Or oppose the bailout and bury Obamacare.



Happy New Year.


​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


THANKS TO YOU WE DID IT!

                               SAVE A LIFE AND YOU'LL HAVE SAVED THE WORLD...

​

View this email in your browser
Thanks to you, We Did It!


YOU DID IT! You helped us reach our goal to Save Africa's Parrots!


Dear Andrew,

Thanks to the outstanding support of people like you, we have surpassed our goal of raising $100,000 to help Save Africa's Parrots! This means we have even more resources to save these endangered birds - at a time that they need it the most.

Why do they need our help? Many parrot populations are threatened with extinction. In Africa the problem is particularly urgent - parrots there face threats like harvesting for the wildlife trade, habitat loss, disease and persecution as crop pests.

Listen to the interview with Dr. Rowan Martin.But there is hope. The World Parrot Trust has initiated the Africa Conservation Programme (WPT-ACP) to protect African parrot populations. Thanks to the outstanding efforts of WPT-ACP field partners and staff, we are expanding our efforts in 2014 to save these parrots.

We can continue our efforts because of gifts from concerned people like you. The work never ends, and because of that we'll need continued support to help these parrots.

Plus, our generous sponsors have agreed to continue matching all donations made by January 31, so if you haven't yet donated, please consider helping to Save Africa's Parrots today.

Thank you for being a hero to Africa's Parrots!Save Africa's Parrots! Double your gift when you Donate Today!

Best wishes for the New Year,

Steve Milpacher
Operations Director
The World Parrot Trust

 


​CLICK ON DONATE ABOVE....
                    
​                ​


​     ​


WPT Online | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact | About
Copyright © 2014 The World Parrot Trust | Glanmor House, Hayle, Cornwall, TR27 4HB




 

​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​

​      ​
​   


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​




THE ULTIMATUM





Commentary By:
TPATH Contributor
Fredy Lowe
Also Posted at CANADA FREE PRESS




January 3, 2014 ~TPATH~ The New Year is normally a time for renewals and looking enthusiastically towards the newness of our life's calendar as we turn the page on THAT old year ending (you can pause here for an—EW*) but, with a fresh start and rejuvenation we look toward the upcoming events and goals we have set for our future in this new year.  And, with our typically American optimistic can-do-outlook, we take this time to analyze our lives, to stop and consider where we are today and what changes we would like to make for 2014.

(* EW - Internet slang for Exclamation of Disgust!)



So, in order to set aside a little time-to-analyze this past, absolutely horrible year (thanks to you-know-usurper-who) and look with a more positive attitude towards 2014, I had promised myself that I would try to shut-it-down and give it my very best effort to clear my head and enjoy the holidays, all the way from Tuesday, Christmas Eve right through, the day we used to call—'the morning after the night before' - or that back to reality day, of Thursday, January 2, 2014. And, I was proud of myself for getting as far as Friday, morning December 27th.


It was the still of the morning, before anyone else awoke, I grabbed a cup a' joe and saw the new book I'd gotten for Christmas. But, sitting on top of my new book was that ever-handy-iPad, and as if in auto-mode, I picked it up, opened and clicked on the icon for the DRUDGE REPORT. And, there in the top left corner was the 'must-read-link', "Wall Street adviser recommends guns, ammo for protection in collapse…" My initial thought was to tap that little top-off-button and rescue myself with my new book, while thinking how much I truly enjoyed my world of Christmas, surrounded in the love and joy of family and friends, as opposed to the repulsive and insufferable reality of Obama's malevolent world of "recommended guns, ammo for protection in collapse." Sadly, I gave into my curiosity and clicked on that blankity-blank link.


Please realize that the headline writer did not mention the words "in case of", as in "Break Glass 'in case of' Fire" or if by chance there might be a possibility of, no the writer went right for the 'in' word, and I'm guessing most of us no longer need old Slick Willie to define this 2-lettered word, which obviously means: 'inside a…' 'within a…' or 'during a…' Ammo for protection, in-deed!


As I scanned through the article all I could think of was—Really? - this Wall Street financial advisor is just now telling his client to make a list that included guns and ammo, as my cynical self began to think that his brother-in-law must just have purchased a Bug-Out-Bag franchise and he's just gaming the system as any good inside trader would. I'm not going back to check the article, but do think there was an Amazon link to the aforementioned bag of things-you'll-need-in-case-of-collapse.

By the way, here is a link with a complete list of real-stuff recommended 
by WE PLAN TO ENDURE, 
just in case you do.


And, although connecting with those who have plans in place for enduring in collapse are all highly recommended, at that moment in time, I was the guy reaching for the new book while shutting-it-down, remember. But, as any good Canada Free Press loyalist would do, I then clicked on that icon and came uponDoug Hagmann's must-read final report from Rosebud, which made me, not fearful, but sad, that we as a country had potentially come to this moment in the proud history of this once great nation. And, although I will offer my additional thoughts below, it is with a Hat Tip to Mr. Hagmann that I repost: "...ask yourself why there was such an all out effort to marginalize anyone talking about Obama's eligibility in 2008. 
Even so-called conservative pundits fell for the lie that such questions were nothing more than a diversion. They were following a specific drumbeat."


And then Doug closes with what I have long believed to be the truth, "He is the product of decades of planning, made for this very time in history. He was selected to oversee the events I just disclosed. Who has that ability? He is a product of our own intelligence agencies working with globalists. He should be exhibit 'A' to illustrate the need to enforce the Logan Act. Need I say more?"



Many writers, as you know, have quietly attempted to discuss the similarity of these two men over the past four or five years, and I would be remiss not to give an Honorable Mention here, to another exceptionally well written CFP thesis presented by JD Longstreet - with his own vivid comparison, "...if you look at the faces in one of Hitler's crowds and compare them to the faces in Obama's crowd, you will see the same worship of their speaker…but look closely, do you see it? Do you see the vacant…look reflected in those eyes? Trust it. It is telling you, Something is dreadfully wrong." And, although I don't fully concur, he goes on to say, "Be afraid. Be very afraid. No mere mortal should have that kind of power over his fellow human beings. It is too easily misused. It is raw power—and it is corruptible."


And, here is where I do not fully agree with Mr. Longstreet: No matter how far we have transformed over the past five plus years, we are still not some 3rd world banana republic - yet. In my heart, I truly believe that the United States of America is an exceptional nation and was, and will always be a gift from Almighty God, as expressed in our Declaration of Independence, "...and that they are endowed by their Creator with certain 'unalienable' rights…" (meaning incapable of being altered of transferred) and it is our duty as her-temporary-caretakers to take care of this extraordinary gift, to defend, protect and cherish it, to Be Not Afraid…for I go before you always…, against all enemies foreign or domestic, and that no man or army of men will ever take that away from us, not on our watch, they won't! NO ONE! So help me God.


So, my first New Years 'Revolution' is: I will officially stop asking God to grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change, and as of the first day in this new year - I will start changing the things I can no longer accept. I haven't for some time, but as with all revolutions I meant to say - resolutions, especially those we plan to keep, I am putting mine here in writing for you: I no longer accept Barack Hussein Obama as the President of the United States and will offer my dogged determination to do everything 'legally and humanly possible' to be a party to that change. PERIOD!


If you don't feel it yet, you will soon, because time is now of the essence. But, I do not want to waste valuable time by providing another list detailing all his treasonous activities to make sure you understand—why! Although, listing them could easily start and end with one word - BENGHAZI, but my goal here is to suggest what I believe might well be in our future for 2014. Use any clich√© you like for time's-up, but our political leaders have filled their Obamaballoon with as much hot-air as the laws of physics will allow, and ready or not, the damn thing is going to burst-wide-open—fairly soon.


I believe that with Obama I have lost all perspective on what is possible and what is not and feel that many of you may have been considering similar thoughts and/or feelings over the past year or so, the only difference is that CFP gives me this opportunity to put my thoughts down on paper, so that you firstly—will know you are not alone, and secondly - so that you will find comfort in the fact that you are not going crazy—this is REALLY happening to our country, and it is happening now.


Many of us have recently read the once-again relevant words of Cicero, saying, "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within…the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers…heard in the very halls of government itself…He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown…to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is [far] less to fear."


"Barack Obama has rotted the soul of our nation, 
and our reality is now right here in front of us. 
I no longer accept him."

It is by no coincidence that we see the headlines: The DNC Will Defend Obama from Impeachment Possibility, or how on December 21st a number of Democratic lawmakers proposed a bill (HR 3741) that would eliminate the death penalty for treason. So, do you think they also know their Obamaballoon is now at its 'bursting point? With regard to the DNC defending his impeachment, it would unlikely pass the House and not a chance in the Senate. But, HR 3741 gets us closer to our goal; personally, death is too final a conclusion for him, but better to give him a long-lifetime-of-good-obamacare-health in an 8x8 in solitary confinement.


My belief is many of us are reaching for proposals of what should or might well happen in 2014. Here are my unsolicited predictions and/or what I believe to be the short list of possible scenarios that may occur in the first six months of 2014, if not sooner; which are again being presented solely as the opinions, or educated guesses, of this author and are hereby open for your review and comments.


There have been too many valid indicators that a false flag or a series of staged events will occur fairly soon, proving that Doug Hagmann's Rosebud was right; but, for one major issue that they overlooked or would be impossible to have planned for. And, that is the American spirit of survival along with the literally millions of trained military and/or police officers, active and retired, ready to defend the US Constitution, and oh yes, our 2nd Amendment with over 300 million privately owned guns.

As Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods showed us in Benghazi, it doesn't take too many of us to refuse a Stand-Down order to turn their best laid plans up-side-down. 

Number One: Be Not Afraid.
Jim Guirard at American Thinker laid out a well designed plan for a Conviction Without Eviction through a House-led Vote of NO CONFIDENCE. My main concern with this plan is that Speaker Boehner would never agree to bring it to a vote, evidenced by the fact that he would not even assign an Independent Counsel to investigate the treasonous acts related to Benghazi.

There is a secret agreement, already in place, between the usurper and Congress whereby he vacates the office as POTUS in turn for not being prosecuted. More on this later.
This one might be a little far fetched, but consider the group of international bankers and globalists who have supported Obama up until now, they too might be considering 'other plans' before he takes them down with him.

​        ​

There are now more than two-hundred senior military officers who knew of the possibility that they would soon be released,
​FIRED, ​
but refused to believe it until—it happened! And, now that it has happened, are we to believe that all of these veteran military leaders have been coerced into holding back in fear or for the sake of their pensions, and have no plan?


My prayer for 2014 is that Barack Hussein Obama is arrested and removed from office and I believe that the survival of our Constitutional Republic depends upon it.

And, so I repeat for clarity: "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, so my children (and grandchildren) may have peace."
—Thomas Pain. Laus Deo.


January 3, 2014 ~TPATH~




--

"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton


*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This transmission is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information and/or attachments that are privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, duplication or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify the sender by replying immediately to this transmission and destroying the transmission. To unsubscribe to this newsletter, please return this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject bar.

Fair Use Notice:
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Meet Osama bin Laden's Lawyer...and an Anthony Weiner Romance Novel: Is your heart throbbing too? Oliver Stone's new film and return from the dead



JUST IN: Andrew Benjamin @ WESTERN FREE PRESS


AN IMPERIOUS MORAL CODE         
                       

http://www.westernfreepress.com/2014/01/01/capitalisms-imperious-moral-code/


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


        


In Chapter Six "What Sort of Despotism Democratic Nations Have to Fear" of his 1835 book "Democracy in America," Alexis de Tocqueville warned us of the soft tyranny of excessive and intrusive government:

"After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."


  


On the Need for a Political Insurgency

Any country ruled by a small group without broad, popular participation by its citizens provides a political basis for an insurgency. It is an axiom of unconventional warfare that insurgents succeed through chaos and disorder appearing anywhere. The regime fails unless it maintains a degree of order everywhere.

Army Field Manual 3-24 defines an insurgency as an organized, protracted politico-military struggle designed to weaken an occupying power. In our case the occupying power is the political ruling class which has perverted the Constitution, flouted the rule of law and undermined representative government.

Political chaos will inevitably increase as the extent of Obama's lies, fraud and failed policies become evident. Political insurgents can exploit the situation nationwide by identifying local targets of opportunity to disrupt, weaken and defeat the undemocratic activities of the two political parties and the mainstream media. The strategic end state of such a political insurgency is the restoration of the Constitution, the rule of law and genuine representative government.

We are sleeping on a volcano... A wind of revolution blows, the storm is on the horizon. - Alexis de Tocqueville

             


by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD January 2, 2014

SELLIN is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ".

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gun poll: 7 in 10 feel safer in an armed neighborhood

An overwhelming seven in 10 Americans say they would feel safer living in a neighborhood where individuals could own a gun for self defense, the latest indication that support for comprehensive gun control is fading. Rasmussen Reports found that 68 percent of voters polled would feel safer in an armed neighborhood. Just 23 percent said they'd feel safer in "a neighborhood where nobody was allowed to own a gun."

READ MORE

MORE GUNS = LESS CRIME - BELIEVE IT!                      
                      

2013: Fewest police deaths involving firearms since 1887

The number of law-enforcement officers killed by firearms in 2013 fell to levels not seen since the 19th century, according to a report released Monday.

READ MORE

TODAY THERE ARE MORE FIREARMS OWNED BY AMERICANS THAN EVER BEFORE IN HISTORY!

Liberal institutions straightaway cease being liberal the moment they are soundly established: once this is attained no more grievous and thorough enemies of freedom exist than liberal institutions. -- Nietzsche

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Friday Afternoon Roundup - A Government Skeleton Crew

Posted: 27 Dec 2013 01:36 PM PST



IT DIDN'T TAKE A SEAL TEAM

Osama bin Laden's lawyer didn't live in a cave in Afghanistan. Like so many terrorist lawyers, he was a New Yorker. His law office, which has seen more terrorists and their files pass through it than an Afghan cave, sits above a Muslim 99 cent store that offers discounted napkins, sandals and toasters, and is a four-minute drive away from the World Trade Center.

"If I don't support the politics of political clients, I don't take the case," he once said. A few weeks after September 11, he said, "If Osama bin Laden arrived in the United States today and asked me to represent him, sure I'd represent him."

Osama bin Laden never did arrive in the United States, though perhaps one day pieces of him will wash up on a California beach, and his wannabe lawyer had to settle for representing his son-in-law, who, after September 11, had appeared in a video threatening that "the storm of planes will not stop."

America Takes Down Osama bin Laden's Lawyer




Obama Gives Somalia $1.5 Bil, Somalia Bans Christmas




CAN YOU SPOT THE DIFFERENCE? YOU CAN?


BDS GANDER

Eighty years ago, the Nazis dispatched thousands of SA thugs to enforce their boycott of Jewish businesses. Stars of David were painted on windows. Leaflets listing the crimes of the Jews were handed out. Cameras were set up outside stores to photograph anyone violating the Nazi BDS campaign.

Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda minister, called the boycott a "great moral victory." Modern BDS activists echo his rhetoric calling their attacks on Jewish businesses and academics a "moral victory".

The Muslim boycott of Jewish businesses in Israel began in the twenties and predated the Nazi boycott. It may have even helped to inspire it. This was followed by the Arab League boycott of Israel after the Holocaust. The modern BDS boycott is the direct successor of a Saudi policy under a progressive flag.

Boycotting the Israel Boycotters



With 900,000 Vets on Food Stamps, Obama Cuts Military Benefits



YES VIRGINIA

Yes Virginia, there is an Anthony Weiner romance novel. How does this timeless romance for the ages begin?

    "Weiner was different. He wasn't afraid to charge in, make enemies and throw dirt across the aisle. I liked that in a man; and to be honest, I liked Weiner too with his delicate face and Mediterranean eyes. The more I read, the more my blue heart throbbed for him.

    "I logged onto Facebook. I sent him a friend request."

Anthony Weiner Threatens Comeback over Tea Party



Reuters Employed Aspiring Al Qaeda Suicide Bomber in Syria



PEACE OF THE UNJUST

Christians and Jews out-compete Muslims economically in every country. That's why the Muslim Brotherhood with its network of businesses wants to drive Coptic Christians out of Egypt.

The non-oil Muslim countries who are closest to Israel are Malaysia and Lebanon, 32 and 33 places behind Israel. Both countries also have sizable non-Muslim populations. Muslims make up only 50 percent of Lebanon and only 60 percent of Malaysia. No Muslim country without oil has a better GDP Per Capita than a Muslim country with sizable Christian or Buddhist minorities.

Now if you think rationally, this is a reason for Muslims to keep non-Muslims around. But if you think tribally, the only way that Muslims can get ahead is by getting rid of the non-Muslims.

Economics and Peace in the Palestinian Authority



Ex-UK Chief of Defense Says Obama's Regime Change in Libya a Mistake




I SEE ROSAS

That might be a bigger deal if Jesse Jackson didn't compare absolutely everything to the bus that Rosa Parks rode in on. Every time someone cuts in front of Jesse Jackson's limo on the way to a presidential dinner, he begins screaming about Rosa Parks and doesn't stop until he passes out.

Jesse Jackson: Duck Dynasty Worse Than Segregation

               



Chicago's Muslim Comptroller Pleads Guilty to Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering - Mayor Emanuel said nothing criminal was done in Chicago




Oliver Stone to Make Movie About Socialist Dictator Who Returns from the Dead in Bird Form



JIHAD CHECKMATE

When Muslims first hijacked the Indian game of Chaturanga, which became the Persian game of Shatranj, they destroyed all the chess pieces because they considered the figures to be blasphemous.

Chess as we know it had to be recreated in Europe once the dark shadow of Islam fell over the chessboard.

Muslim Country Hosts Chess Tournament , Islamizes the Chess Pieces



               
Only AOL could pay millions in 2010 for a 1998 business model based on MSNBC's, which after 12 years of CONTINUOUSLY having been funded by GE and Microsoft is still losing money. AOL and Huffington are the SOLYNDRA of the publishing world.

Huffington Post Still Losing Money



By 2007 George W. Bush had pacified Iraq and vanquished al Q'aeda. There was no significant al Q'aeda activity recorded for the year. By 2012 Barack Obama had unpacified Iraq by flushing down the toilet the investment the United States had spent (hundreds of billions) and today Iraq has the same level of violence it had in 2005 - it is in the midst of A CIVIL WAR with al Q'aeda more active then ever! Had the United States stayed in Iraq, today we'd certainly have better leverage in dealing with BOTH Iran and Syria...the last an Iranian client. But that's Barack for you - for his kind, every decision is a bad decision for American interests. PEACE! IF YOU CAN STAND IT.

THE I WORD

What it's really doing is clumsily duplicating the Predator setup, without actually giving them Predators, which is smart because anything you give Iraq, you also give Iran.

But clumsily outsourcing Predator strikes means that intelligence moves much more slowly and is more vulnerable to leaks on the other side. It also means that Al Qaeda and Iran both get a preview of our intelligence resources.

So it's a bad solution that's meant to keep Obama at arm's length from the I word.

Iraq War May Be Restarting with CIA Drone Targeting






Devout Muslim Killer of UK Soldier Also Drugged and Raped 14-Year-Old - 'I have looked in his eyes and seen the evil inside him,'




SAVE THE OWLS, KILL THE OWLS

So humans weren't responsible for the decline of the barred owl. Banning logging didn't do it. The barrel owl just can't compete. So now we're going to go around shooting its competitor owl, even though this is how nature works and this is how species change.

That's a cost of almost $1,000 per owl. I suspect it would be cheaper to just declare a $50 bounty per barred owl than to hire "contractors" to play an owl call and then shoot them with a shotgun at 1K per owl.

US Gov Spending $3.5 Mil Killing Owls to Save Owls



ObamaCare Website Didn't Recognize Obama




THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THEY REMAIN THE SAME




Palestinian Muslims: "We Are All Hitler. Hitler, You Have Brought Pride to the Homeland and Allah,"



Did UNICEF Give Money to Al Qaeda?



A very fine street car conductor...indeed

UNION POLITICS

This story is about a labor leader I once met whom I did understood. This fellow was named Herr Eichhorn and he'd become dictator in a town in Germany named Dusseldorf.

There'd been an uprising and the Bolsheviks captured the town. Eichhorn had been a street car conductor and now he found himself in the Burgomeister's Palace as a dictator of whatever province Dusseldorf was in. He was running the works.

I met him at the palace to talk. He was a very fine street car conductor who sat there beaming and happy at his desk. I asked him what he'd done since he'd become a dictator.

"Well the first thing O did is two days after I was dictator, I doubled the salaries of all the street car employees," he said.

"That's fine, what else did you do?"

"I doubled the salaries of all the street cleaners. In fact I've doubled all the salaries in Dusseldorf."

"Where do you get all the money to pay all these double wages?" I asked.

He said, "I get it out of the treasury of Dusseldorf."

So I thought for a moment and I asked him, "What'll happen when you run out of the money in the Treasury of Dusseldorf? How are you going to pay these double wages?"

He grinned. "I'm not worried about that, by the time that happens I won't be dictator."

(The Ben Hecht Show Dec 4, 1958)





--

"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton


*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This transmission is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information and/or attachments that are privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, duplication or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify the sender by replying immediately to this transmission and destroying the transmission. To unsubscribe to this newsletter, please return this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject bar.

Fair Use Notice:
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.

Monday, December 30, 2013

SNIPPETS' Message to Friends and Fans for THE NEW YEAR..





MOVE THROUGH LIFE WITH GRACE, EQUANIMITY, KINDNESS, CHARITY AND HOPE; FREE OF RESENTMENT AND BITTERNESS; FOR AS SOON AS BITTERNESS LEAVES YOUR SOUL, YOU SEE THE WOLD WITH ROSE COLORED GLASSES.  BE FILLED WITH EMPATHY FOR YOUR FELLOW MEN. AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD YOU TAKE KINDLY TO STUPIDITY OR CONSENT TO A POLITICAL SYSTEM THAT VIOLATES YOUR FUTURE AND YOUR RIGHTS. FOR CHRISTIANS AND JEWS I REMIND THEM: G-D HELPS THOSE WHO HELP THEMSELVES! AND G-D HELP YOU!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

National Review Online

December 24, 2013 12:00 AM
Mazel Tov, Christians!
Most Jews wish you a Merry Christmas.
By Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

As a Jew, and a religious one at that, I want to wish my fellow Americans a Merry Christmas.

Not "Happy Holidays." Merry Christmas.

I write, "my fellow Americans" because, as reported by the Pew Research poll released just last Wednesday, nine in ten Americans say they celebrate Christmas.

Apparently, many Americans have forgotten that Christmas is not only a Christian holy day, but also an American national holiday. Just as we wish one another a "Happy Thanksgiving" or a "Happy Fourth," so, too, we should wish fellow Americans a "Merry Christmas."

It doesn't matter with which religion or ethnic group you identify; Christmas in America is as American as the proverbial apple pie. That is why some of the most famous and beloved Christmas songs were written by . . . guess who? Jews.

"White Christmas" was written by Irving Berlin (birth name: Israel Isidore Baline).

"Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer" — Johnny Marks.

"Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!" — composed by Jule Styne, lyrics by Sammy Cahn.

"Silver Bells" — by Jay Livingston (Jacob Harold Levison) and Ray Evans (Raymond Bernard Evans).

"The Christmas Song (Chestnuts Roasting on an Open Fire)" — Mel Tormé and Robert Wells (Robert Levinson), both Jews.

"Sleigh Ride" — lyrics by Mitchell Parish (Michael Hyman Pashelinsky).

There are many others as well.

The notion that non-Christians are excluded is absurd.

Americans who feel "excluded" are not excluded. They have decided to feel excluded. Which is, of course, entirely their right to do; no one forces anyone to celebrate any American holiday. But attempts to remove Christmas from the public sphere are destructive to our society. It would be as if Jehovah's Witnesses attempted to remove public celebrations and references to the Fourth of July because they don't celebrate national holidays.

Why are these attempts destructive? Because the entire society — Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists as well as Christians — benefits from the goodness and joy that the Christmas season engenders.

It never occurred to my Orthodox Jewish family not to enjoy this season. It was a tradition in our home to watch the Christmas Mass from the Vatican every Christmas Eve (unless it was a Friday evening, and therefore the Sabbath, when no television watching was allowed). Had you visited our home, you would have seen my mother — and my father, my brother, and me, all wearing our kippot (Jewish skullcaps) — watching Catholics celebrate Christmas.

Nor did it ever occur to my brother, Dr. Kenneth Prager, an Orthodox Jew, not to sing Christmas songs when he was a member of the Columbia University Glee Club. He happily sang not only secular Christmas songs, but religious Christ-centered Christmas songs as well.

So when and why did this pernicious nonsense of non-Christians being "excluded" by public celebrations of Christmas develop?

It is nothing more than another destructive product of the 1960s and 1970s, when the Left came to dominate much of the culture.

One way in which the Left has done this has been through "multiculturalism," the Left's way of dividing Americans by religion, ethnicity, race, and national origin.

The other way has been through its aim of secularizing America — which means, first and foremost, the removal of as many Christian references as possible.

The Left regularly mocks the notion that there is a war against Christmas, a description that left-wing writers almost place within quotation marks, as if it were a manufactured falsehood.

Pages


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TIME FOR THE WELL-HEELED TO GIVE BACK!

VEXATIOUS
LIBERAL
'LEXICONS'





By Dwight Kehoe
Editor www.TPATH.org


December 29, 2013 ~TPATH~ Over the years, as part of the planned ruination of our culture and society the left has endeavored
to label and define activity, by use of words they choose and phrases they create.  All the while, our side, acquiesces and accepts and even uses those terms and then wonders why they always lose the propaganda battle.

Here are a few examples:

GIVING BACK:
This may be one of the most irritating and misleading liberal slogans being used everyday and accepted by those being targeted by it.  The nefarious inference here is that those who have earned or created enough wealth to give charitably, have somehow, by odious or unscrupulousness activity, acquired that wealth from their victims and hence, need to
GIVE IT BACK.

Giving back is something one does if caught taking what is not his.  What GIVING actually is, is those working and earning something are taking some of those earnings and giving it to those who have not earned it, nor have they ever had it taken or stolen from them.

Conservatives, by astronomical amounts, give more of what they have earned to those in need than the liberal side of the donation spectrum.  This is a fact as well as it is a fact that liberals would much prefer to give to those who have not earned it from the pockets of those who have. Provided of course it comes not from their pockets.

It is time those GIVING what is theirs, to help those receiving it, cease allowing this term to be used.  It not only degrades the giver but also degrades the charitable nature of that which is being given.  If the next time you see the term Giving Back on a donation or charity event form, before you send your check, use a maker and x-out the BACK word. Unless of course you have stolen what you are returning.


REDISTRIBUTION:
While it may be true that most progressive leftist politicians love this word and its concept, it is also true, they hide from it.  Those who espouse Marxism and follow that manifesto, such as the "Forger in the White House", push policies which confiscate what others have earned and secretly love the term Redistribution of Wealth, even as they publicly deny that is what they are doing.

Why did Marx use that term? Its quite simple.  It is used, as is required to build and hold onto power, to create separation, envy, covetousness and malignity between the so called classes.

For things such as money, property or other forms of wealth to be RE-DISTRIBUTED, it must first have been DISTRIBUTED.  Clearly that indicates it wasn't earned or created.  It was distributed to some and not to others. The only recourse then would be to redistribute it, more fairly.

Its time we stopped using this leftist term and began calling it what it is, CONFISCATION and DISBURSEMENT.


COMMON SENSE GUN LAWS:

When you hear this term being used by politicians and law makers, you had better check for the latest shredding of our Constitution.  As with every bill or law that slithers out of state and national legislative sessions, whatever they name it, for sure, it will represent exactly the opposite.  Case in point, "The Affordable Health Care Act".

These heavy thinkers consider it Common Sense to announce that no one in schools or public places will be armed and able to stop mass killings.  And that those who may be planning to slaughter people, will carry out their attack in a location where there are armed defenders. After all, its just common sense that if no guns are allowed no one will commit a crime with one.  Makes one feel so safe and snugly.

Who could argue that restricting magazine capacity for law abiding citizens is anything but Common Sense?  With these laws working to protect us, no self respecting terrorist, drug cartel member or homicidal maniac would take advantage of their victims by flouting magazine capacity laws.

These of course are just a few examples of legislative "Common Sense".  It appears that Common Sense is not very Common anymore.

December 29, 2013 ~TPATH~

Contact Dwight HERE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NO SENSE OF HISTORY AND NO HISTORICAL SENSE

Family Security Matters

Un-transforming America

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD December 29, 2013

In his article, "Why Americans Are Not Taught History," Christopher Hitchens, identified the vulnerability of America's present-tense culture to the utopian myth.

That is, for the truly blissed-out and vacant servitude required by the Obama strategy, you need an otherwise sophisticated society to lose any sense of its own history and traditions. Using media deception and historical revisionism, the low-information voter will slouch towards Obama's utopia by a combination of governmental coercion as in George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four" and the hedonist nihilism of a painless, amusement-sodden, and stress-free consensus managed by the nanny-state found in Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World."

In the book "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Neil Postman notes that in "Nineteen Eighty-Four," people are controlled by inflicting pain; in "Brave New World," they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture. Obama plans to do both.

Ultimately, when the government is ruled by individuals unconstrained by law, there are few things that power cannot do. It can make political allies rich or paupers of political enemies. It can waste billions of dollars without accountability and destroy an economy without responsibility. It can make incompetent men high officials or make extraordinary men corpses.

The accumulation of excessive power in the federal government transforms it into a dysfunctional super-state dedicated to maintaining its own power irrespective of truth or the well-being of the country. The bureaucrats can ignore both morality and the lessons of history, in order to protect their appetite for and the use of raw power. Under such circumstances, the government need not fear that any of its agencies will intervene on behalf of the people, nor will it hear any protests from their elected representatives, nor anything but polite questions from the national media.

We now have a government and media of perfidious men and women, who are willing to risk the survival of the country rather than risk the truth.

There is a Cold Civil War underway in the United States to determine who should control the federal government. It is not a contest between the Democrat and Republican ideologies, but a battle between the entrenched power of the bipartisan political establishment versus the rights and liberties of the American people
​.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ".

​

​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​


​FIRST OBAMACARE CLINIC OPENS IN CHICAGO
IT'S A RIOT!
              
            

http://truenewsusa.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-nations-first-obamacare-clinic.html​


​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE LIED TO, DECEIVED WITH ASTONISHING CONSPIRACY THEORIES, AND DISTRACTED WITH FALSE NARRATIVES...THEY WERE ALSO TOLD THERE WERE NO WMD'S IN IRAQ!

LIES HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT!

WHY?

After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.

AGB: The New York Times, not to be outdone, just recently "reported" that al Q'aeda had nothing to do with BenghaziGate...that the waves of co-ordinated mortar and RPG attacks accurately deployed happened because of an obscure video from California, reversing even what the administration shortly admitted to - lies to begin with, the rest redacted. Interestingly, 4000 TWITTER posts data mined the day after the attack could not uncover a single one that referenced the anti-Islamic video, but never mind. Never mind that one of the identified Jihadists at the Annex was released from Gitmo. The New York Times is a propaganda paper long ago taken over by radicals to whom al Q'aeda disappeared with the fish food that was formerly Osama bin Laden.

Meanwhile the White House never let the people see an entire section of Congress' investigative report on 9/11 dealing with "specific sources of foreign support" for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

It was kept secret and remains so today.

President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn't just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are "absolutely shocked" at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can't reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So they've proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to declassify the entire 2002 report, "Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001."

http://tinyurl.com/o9ujbup

EVIDENCE WILL EVENTUALLY BE REVEALED CONNECTING SAUDI, IRAQI AND IRANIAN INVOLVEMENT WHEN THESE PAPERS BECOME DECLASSIFIED. MARK MY WORDS!

My own documentation reprinted by a website at the link below will be interesting for those still MARRIED to their own conspiracy theories - all of which are substantially destroyed in the referenced - with the comment below ending the sorry tale:

http://freedombasecamp.org/site-info/truth/164-news-reporting-and-journalism/71-u-s-to-iraq-on-false-pretense


So Dear Reader, if you had read the link above you will have seen for yourself that documented history proves that just about everything you've read in the US media and abroad too, about how the US entered a decade-long war on false pretenses, was the exact opposite of the media "narratives." Narratives as in myths, fairy tales, tall stories, fibs, outright lies, ghostbusting and UFO sightings.

In other words, everything was so unless it wasn't. And it wasn't so.

You now know that the leftwing of the political divide LIE because of their need to re-allocate the nation's national security and defense resources toward their own ends, to "control" what is; they lie because that is the only way they can get what they want, they lie because that's who they are, and they lie to achieve whatever those ends may be. But then they're always moving the goalposts FORWARD, and not because they are Patriotic Americans.

Mostly because they're so Progressive they are actually BACKWARD, living in the non-workable ideas of the 19th Century, as one great pundit, Sultan Knish, so astutely observed at this link.            
                 

The World of Tomorrow

No matter how many times they try to convince themselves the left are patriotic (just like you are), just hold this story and these links up to their faces, in the mirrors of which they will see the tyranny they had given birth to reflected right back.

Tyranny is a scandal—not a scandal in the sense of Watergate, or of Eliot Spitzer's socks—but in the sense of being a gigantic lie hiding in plain sight, a lie that seeks to violently compel others to submit to its claims or else participate in them. As with any lie, it is sustained only to the extent that it is believed. And, as with any lie, it is undone the moment one person—whether that's Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn or Natan Sharansky or Václav Havel or Liu Xiaobo or Ayaan Hirsi Ali—stands up and says: It is not so!

- Brett Stevens, Commentary Magazine July 2012 "BORN on the 4th of June"

THAT LAST, FRIENDS, IS WHAT YOU NEED TO REMEMBER FOR 2014 AND 2016 AS THE NEW YORK TIMES IS POSITIONING THAT WASHED OUT RAG, aka HILLARY CLINTON, FOR THE HIGHEST OFFICE TO WHICH SHE IS ABOUT AS UNSUITED AS ONE CAN EVER BE.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[It's not often that I send around a piece from the NYT. But this Op-Ed from a Saudi envoy caught my eye because with only a few changes it could easily have been written by an Israeli diplomat - if only Israel had the requisite Jewish pride and self-esteem. Which anyone following the events in the Middle East knows is sorely lacking. df]

 

 
 

 

12/17/2013

 

Saudi Arabia Will Go It Alone

 

By MOHAMMED BIN NAWAF BIN ABDULAZIZ AL SAUD

 

London — Saudi Arabia has been friends with our Western partners for decades; for some, like the United Kingdom where I serve as ambassador, for almost a century. These are strategic alliances that benefit us both. Recently, these relationships have been tested — principally because of differences over Iran and Syria.

We believe that many of the West's policies on both Iran and Syria risk the stability and security of the Middle East. This is a dangerous gamble, about which we cannot remain silent, and will not stand idly by.

The crisis in Syria continues unabated. There have been over 100,000 civilian deaths. Most shockingly of all, the Oxford Research Group reports that of the 11,000 victims under 17 and under, more than 70 percent were killed by air strikes and artillery shells deliberately targeting civilian areas.

While international efforts have been taken to remove the weapons of mass destruction used by the murderous regime of Bashar al-Assad, surely the West must see that the regime itself remains the greatest weapon of mass destruction of all? Chemical weapons are but a small cog in Mr. Assad's killing machine. While he may appear to be going along with every international initiative to end the conflict, his regime will continue to do everything in its power to frustrate any serious solution.

The Assad regime is bolstered by the presence of Iranian forces in Syria. These soldiers did not enter Syria to protect it from a hostile external occupation; they are there to support an evil regime that is hurting and harming the Syrian people. It is a familiar pattern for Iran, which has financed and trained militias in Iraq, Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon and militants in Yemen and Bahrain.

And yet rather than challenging the Syrian and Iranian governments, some of our Western partners have refused to take much-needed action against them. The West has allowed one regime to survive and the other to continue its program for uranium enrichment, with all the consequent dangers of weaponization.

This year's talks with Iran may dilute the West's determination to deal with both governments. What price is "peace" though, when it is made with such regimes?

The foreign policy choices being made in some Western capitals risk the stability of the region and, potentially, the security of the whole Arab world. This means the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has no choice but to become more assertive in international affairs: more determined than ever to stand up for the genuine stability our region so desperately needs.

Saudi Arabia has enormous responsibilities within the region, as the cradle of Islam and one of the Arab world's most significant political powers. We have global responsibilities — economic and political — as the world's de facto central banker for energy. And we have a humanitarian responsibility to do what we can to end the suffering in Syria.

We will act to fulfill these responsibilities, with or without the support of our Western partners. Nothing is ruled out in our pursuit of sustainable peace and stability in the Arab World as King Abdullah — then Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince — showed with his leadership of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

We showed our preparedness to act independently with our decision to reject a seat on the United Nations Security Council. What point was there in serving in an international talking shop when so many lives are threatened, and so many opportunities for peace and security are being thwarted by the U.N.'s inability to act?

We continue to show our determination through our support for the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian opposition. It is too easy for some in the West to use the threat of Al Qaeda's terrorist operations in Syria as an excuse for hesitation and inaction. Al Qaeda's activities are a symptom of the international community's failure to intervene. They should not become a justification for inaction. The way to prevent the rise of extremism in Syria — and elsewhere — is to support the champions of moderation: financially, materially and yes, militarily, if necessary. To do otherwise is to walk on by, while a humanitarian disaster and strategic failure continue to fester.

Saudi Arabia will continue on this new track for as long as proves necessary. We expected to be standing shoulder to shoulder with our friends and partners who have previously talked so much about the importance of moral values in foreign policy. But this year, for all their talk of "red lines," when it counted, our partners have seemed all too ready to concede our safety and risk our region's stability.

Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz al Saud is Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Britain.
​


--

"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton


*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This transmission is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information and/or attachments that are privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, duplication or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify the sender by replying immediately to this transmission and destroying the transmission. To unsubscribe to this newsletter, please return this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject bar.

Fair Use Notice:
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owners. NOTICE: Any email sent to my email address is granted rights of reproduction and/or distribution by the sender and/or authors.


Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Something to OCCUPY Your Thoughts

Some of these are very true!

*A Cow based Economics Lesson;

SOCIALISM
You have 2 cows.
You give one to your neighbor. ^(Actually now with current socialism it is coming much too close to communism.)

COMMUNISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and gives you some milk.

FASCISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and sells you some milk.

NAZISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and shoots you.

BUREAUCRATISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other, and then throws the milk away.

TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM


You have two cows

.
You sell one and buy a bull

.
Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows.


You sell them and retire on the income.

ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND (VENTURE) CAPITALISM
You have two cows.
You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows.
The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company.
The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more.
You sell one cow to buy a new president of the United States , leaving you with nine cows.
No balance sheet provided with the release.
The public then buys your bull.

SURREALISM
You have two giraffes.
The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.

AN AMERICAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows.
Later, you hire a consultant to analyze why the cow has dropped dead.

A FRENCH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You go on strike, organize a riot, and block the roads, because you
want three cows.

A JAPANESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce twenty times the milk.
You then create a clever cow cartoon image called a Cowkimona and market it worldwide.

AN ITALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows, but you don't know where they are.
You decide to have lunch.

A SWISS CORPORATION
You have 5000 cows. None of them belong to you.
You charge the owners for storing them.

A CHINESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You have 300 people milking them.
You claim that you have full employment, and high bovine productivity.
You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation.

AN INDIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You worship them.

A BRITISH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
Both are mad.

AN IRAQI CORPORATION
Everyone thinks you have lots of cows.
You tell them that you have none.
No-one believes you, so they bomb the ** out of you and invade your country.
You still have no cows, but at least you are now a Democracy.

AN AUSTRALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
Business seems pretty good.
You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate.

A NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION
You have two cows.
The one on the left looks very attractive.





(FOR MORE STUFF LIKE THIS GO TO PressingForTruth) 
 Pressing For Truth

Contributed by Martin K.